Relatives' Distress Regarding Shoreline Erosion Endangering Norfolk Graves
Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.
A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards
The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.
A newly published study on the issue details a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.
“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”
Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.
Troubled by the Past
One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.
“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”
“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”
A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril
Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.
“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”
In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”
Seeking Answers and Certainty
An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.
Several families are calling for more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.
“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”
A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”
It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”
“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the right answers for each village.”
The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.