🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to resume atomic talks with Washington on condition that it is handled with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has stated.

The Iranian diplomat declared solely negotiations worked, and shared fresh requests had been made by intermediaries to reopen discussions with the American leadership. He claimed Iran possessed no secret atomic facilities, and Tehran could not yet authorize the global atomic watchdog to inspect bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Walking a Complex Course

Araghchi is navigating a complex course since Iran does not want appear to be proceeding from a position of weakness, and he consistently maintained that Iran had arisen more powerful militarily and mentally from the coordinated strike on its atomic facilities in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material within its borders that it will never give up" – the primary cause of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.

Earlier Negotiations Unexpectedly Ended

The prior phases of talks between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a 12-day war that culminated with the US president claiming the facilities had been obliterated. Subsequently, Western states used their right to restore international penalties, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Magic Solution Proposed

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had attained a "magic solution" to the enrichment issue in earlier negotiations, when it was settled an local partnership with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to assert triumph since local refinement would have remained and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.

It had not been settled in the talks that Washington's technical specialists could function within Iranian territory, but that was a logical implication of the consortium proposal. Officials asserted on multiple occasions they had reached agreement with the US representative the US official only for the deal to fall apart due to "detractors in America".

Present Situation

Iran's diplomats said the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be reintroduced in some form if discussions resume.

Trump in recent days claimed he had been getting signals that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but privately Iran's diplomats state they are not yet obtaining clear proposals from America either directly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been accused of passivity in the wake of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran states dialogue is not part of a show.

Negotiating Stance

In his address to the conference, designed to portray the US as a controlling nation that abuses the concept of worldwide standards, Araghchi said the 12-day war showed the conflict could not be resolved by military means. He asserted the strikes began with a US demand for an total Iran submission and culminated with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were executed with full US knowledge and coordination, making trust difficult to reestablish.

Diplomacy Stays the Primary Answer

The foreign minister declared: "Tehran was not the one that had fled diplomacy; it was the United States and the western countries that had always attempted to impose their desires during the discussions. Dialogue can still be active and continues the ultimate resolution to resolve disagreements, but its requirements, rules and tenets must be respected."

"Provided that they talk to the Iranian people with the tone of dignity and respect, they will get a answer in the identical language."

Repair and Recovery

In what is portrayed by Iranian officials as the battle of recovery and recovery, Araghchi stated he was assured Iran's defence capabilities "have significantly improved than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We learned many lessons from this conflict; we have come to know our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the adversary."

He stated: "We successfully passed this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to obliterate, continues to exist. The sites and equipment, if eliminated, will be rebuilt; what is important is the determination of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they aimed at, but failed to shatter. The citizens of Tehran have become stronger, more united, and more endorsing of the leadership and the nation in the face of this attack."